On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:27:06 +0100, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never > actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around. > Just do the macro replacement to improve readability. > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> For some reason I don't understand, b4 doesn't want to cherry-pick this patch from the list. I've applied it manually to kvm-arm64/misc-5.15. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
