On 8/10/21 7:01 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:36:38AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never >> actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around. >> Just do the macro replacement to improve readability. >> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> This applies on v5.14-rc5 >> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 6 +++--- >> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > Please can you split this with the KVM parts in their own patch? Sure, will do. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
