On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:36:38AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never > actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around. > Just do the macro replacement to improve readability. > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx> > --- > This applies on v5.14-rc5 > > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +- > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +- > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 2 +- > arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 6 +++--- > 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Please can you split this with the KVM parts in their own patch? Thanks, Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
