Re: [PATCH v12 6/8] arm64: kvm: Expose KVM_ARM_CAP_MTE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/05/2021 18:40, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 13:32:37 +0100,
> Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It's now safe for the VMM to enable MTE in a guest, so expose the
>> capability to user space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c      | 9 +++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 3 +++
>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index 1cb39c0803a4..e89a5e275e25 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
>>  		r = 0;
>>  		kvm->arch.return_nisv_io_abort_to_user = true;
>>  		break;
>> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE:
>> +		if (!system_supports_mte() || kvm->created_vcpus)
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		r = 0;
>> +		kvm->arch.mte_enabled = true;
> 
> As far as I can tell from the architecture, this isn't valid for a
> 32bit guest.

Indeed, however the MTE flag is a property of the VM not of the vCPU.
And, unless I'm mistaken, it's technically possible to create a VM where
some CPUs are 32 bit and some 64 bit. Not that I can see much use of a
configuration like that.

Steve
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux