Hi Marc, On Monday 22 Mar 2021 at 18:37:14 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote: > Can't say I'm keen on the yucky bit, but here's an alternative (ha!) > for you: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > index 1a4cee7eb3c9..7582c3bd2f05 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h > @@ -278,6 +278,9 @@ alternative_else > ldr_l \reg, arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 + ARM64_FTR_SYSVAL > alternative_endif > #else > +alternative_if_not ARM64_KVM_PROTECTED_MODE > + ASM_BUG() > +alternative_else_nop_endif > alternative_cb kvm_compute_final_ctr_el0 > movz \reg, #0 > movk \reg, #0, lsl #16 > > Yes, it is one more instruction, but it is cleaner and allows us to > from the first patch of the series. > > What do you think? Yes, I think having the ASM_BUG() in this macro is bit nicer and I doubt the additional nop will make any difference, so this is looking good to me! Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
