On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:15:51 +0100 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/15/2020 11:14 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:13:54AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > >> On 04/14/2020 10:31 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > >>> Although we emit a "SANITY CHECK" warning and taint the kernel if we > >>> detect a CPU mismatch for AArch32 support at EL1, we still online the > >>> CPU with disastrous consequences for any running 32-bit VMs. > >>> > >>> Introduce a capability for AArch32 support at EL1 so that late onlining > >>> of incompatible CPUs is forbidden. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> One of the other important missing sanity check for KVM is the VMID width > >> check. I will code something up. > > > > Cheers! Do we handle things like the IPA size already? > > Good point. No, we don't. I will include this too. There is also the question of the ARMv8.5-GTG extension. I have a patch that treats it as non-strict, but that approach would fail with KVM if we online a late CPU without support for the right page size at S2. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
