Hi Marc,
On 2020/4/14 18:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
When a guest tries to read the active state of its interrupts,
we currently just return whatever state we have in memory. This
means that if such an interrupt lives in a List Register on another
CPU, we fail to obsertve the latest active state for this interrupt.
In order to remedy this, stop all the other vcpus so that they exit
and we can observe the most recent value for the state.
Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 4 +-
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 4 +-
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h | 3 +
4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
index 5945f062d749..d63881f60e1a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
@@ -422,11 +422,11 @@ static const struct vgic_register_region vgic_v2_dist_registers[] = {
VGIC_ACCESS_32bit),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET,
vgic_mmio_read_active, vgic_mmio_write_sactive,
- NULL, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_sactive, 1,
+ vgic_uaccess_read_active, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_sactive, 1,
VGIC_ACCESS_32bit),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_CLEAR,
vgic_mmio_read_active, vgic_mmio_write_cactive,
- NULL, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_cactive, 1,
+ vgic_uaccess_read_active, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_cactive, 1,
VGIC_ACCESS_32bit),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_PRI,
vgic_mmio_read_priority, vgic_mmio_write_priority, NULL, NULL,
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
index e72dcc454247..77c8ba1a2535 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
@@ -553,11 +553,11 @@ static const struct vgic_register_region vgic_v3_dist_registers[] = {
VGIC_ACCESS_32bit),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ_SHARED(GICD_ISACTIVER,
vgic_mmio_read_active, vgic_mmio_write_sactive,
- NULL, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_sactive, 1,
+ vgic_uaccess_read_active, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_sactive, 1,
VGIC_ACCESS_32bit),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ_SHARED(GICD_ICACTIVER,
vgic_mmio_read_active, vgic_mmio_write_cactive,
- NULL, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_cactive,
+ vgic_uaccess_read_active, vgic_mmio_uaccess_write_cactive,
1, VGIC_ACCESS_32bit),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ_SHARED(GICD_IPRIORITYR,
vgic_mmio_read_priority, vgic_mmio_write_priority, NULL, NULL,
Shouldn't we also set this uaccess_read cb for GICR_I{S,C}ACTIVER0?
Thanks,
Zenghui
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
