Hi
On 3/6/20 2:36 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:21:37PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Drew,
>>
>> On 2/7/20 3:06 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:34:59AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> Add two new migration tests. One testing the migration of
>>>> a topology where collection were unmapped. The second test
>>>> checks the migration of the pending table.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>> - tests belong to both its and migration groups
>>>> ---
>>>> arm/gic.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> arm/unittests.cfg | 16 +++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
>>>> index fa8626a..ec3dd3a 100644
>>>> --- a/arm/gic.c
>>>> +++ b/arm/gic.c
>>>> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void lpi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>>>> smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in lpi_stats_expect */
>>>> lpi_stats.observed.cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
>>>> lpi_stats.observed.lpi_id = irqnr;
>>>> + acked[lpi_stats.observed.cpu_id]++;
>>>> smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_lpi_stats */
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -239,6 +240,18 @@ static void secondary_lpi_test(void)
>>>> while (1)
>>>> wfi();
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> +static void check_lpi_hits(int *expected)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
>>>> + if (acked[i] != expected[i])
>>>> + report(false, "expected %d LPIs on PE #%d, %d observed",
>>>> + expected[i], i, acked[i]);
>>>
>>> report_info
>>> pass = false
>>>
>>>> + }
>>>> + report(true, "check LPI on all vcpus");
>>>
>>> report(pass, ...);
>> I still don't get the issue.
>
> Your messages aren't consistent and have dynamic info. You need
>
> report_info(...); // dynamic info
> if (failure_condition) {
> pass_boolean = false;
> }
> report(pass_boolean, single_message_for_both_pass_and_failure);
OK understood.
Thanks!
Eric
>
>>>
>>>> +}
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> static void gicv2_ipi_send_self(void)
>>>> @@ -594,6 +607,8 @@ static void gic_test_mmio(void)
>>>> static void test_its_introspection(void) {}
>>>> static void test_its_trigger(void) {}
>>>> static void test_its_migration(void) {}
>>>> +static void test_migrate_unmapped_collection(void) {}
>>>> +static void test_its_pending_migration(void) {}
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what's worse. This pile of stubs or one #ifdef in main()
>>> wrapping all the calls.
>> Those stubs now are in the arm header.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> #else /* __arch64__ */
>>>>
>>>> @@ -666,6 +681,18 @@ static bool its_prerequisites(int nb_cpus)
>>>> return false;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void set_lpi(struct its_device *dev, u32 eventid, u32 physid,
>>>> + struct its_collection *col)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (!dev || !col)
>>>
>>> I don't think col can be null, and this doesn't look like the right place
>>> to check if dev is null. If we're bothiner to call set_lpi, then I
>>> think we should already expect dev to be good to go.
>> put an assert() instead
>>>
>>>> + report_abort("wrong device or collection");
>>>> +
>>>> + its_send_mapti(dev, physid, eventid, col);
>>>> +
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_set_config(physid, LPI_PROP_DEFAULT);
>>>> + its_send_invall(col);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * Setup the configuration for those mappings:
>>>> * dev_id=2 event=20 -> vcpu 3, intid=8195
>>>> @@ -806,6 +833,121 @@ static void test_its_migration(void)
>>>> its_send_int(dev7, 255);
>>>> check_lpi_stats();
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> +static void test_migrate_unmapped_collection(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct its_collection *col;
>>>> + struct its_device *dev2, *dev7;
>>>> + u8 config;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (its_setup1())
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + col = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 1, nr_cpus - 1);
>>>> + dev2 = its_get_device(2);
>>>> + dev7 = its_get_device(7);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* MAPTI with the collection unmapped */
>>>> + set_lpi(dev2, 0, 8192, col);
>>>> +
>>>> + puts("Now migrate the VM, then press a key to continue...\n");
>>>> + (void)getchar();
>>>> + report(true, "Migration complete");
>>>
>>> report_info
>> yep
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + /* on the destination, map the collection */
>>>> + its_send_mapc(col, true);
>>>> +
>>>> + lpi_stats_expect(2, 8196);
>>>> + its_send_int(dev7, 255);
>>>> + check_lpi_stats();
>>>> +
>>>> + config = gicv3_lpi_get_config(8192);
>>>> + report(config == LPI_PROP_DEFAULT,
>>>> + "Config of LPI 8192 was properly migrated");
>>>> +
>>>> + lpi_stats_expect(nr_cpus - 1, 8192);
>>>> + its_send_int(dev2, 0);
>>>> + check_lpi_stats();
>>>> +
>>>> + /* unmap the collection */
>>>> + its_send_mapc(col, false);
>>>> +
>>>> + lpi_stats_expect(-1, -1);
>>>> + its_send_int(dev2, 0);
>>>> + check_lpi_stats();
>>>> +
>>>> + /* remap event 0 onto lpiid 8193 */
>>>> + set_lpi(dev2, 0, 8193, col);
>>>> + lpi_stats_expect(-1, -1);
>>>> + its_send_int(dev2, 0);
>>>> + check_lpi_stats();
>>>> +
>>>> + /* remap the collection */
>>>> + its_send_mapc(col, true);
>>>> + lpi_stats_expect(nr_cpus - 1, 8193);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void test_its_pending_migration(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct its_device *dev;
>>>> + struct its_collection *collection[2];
>>>> + int expected[NR_CPUS];
>>>
>>> expected = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(int));
>>>
>>> I know there are other places using NR_CPUS right now that don't have to,
>>> but we shouldn't add more. Eventually I'll change the other places too.
>> OK
>>>
>>>> + u64 pendbaser;
>>>> + void *ptr;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (its_prerequisites(4))
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = its_create_device(2 /* dev id */, 8 /* nb_ites */);
>>>> + its_send_mapd(dev, true);
>>>> +
>>>> + collection[0] = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 1, nr_cpus - 1);
>>>> + collection[1] = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 2, nr_cpus - 2);
>>>> + its_send_mapc(collection[0], true);
>>>> + its_send_mapc(collection[1], true);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* disable lpi at redist level */
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 1, false);
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 2, false);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* even lpis are assigned to even cpu */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
>>>> + struct its_collection *col = i % 2 ? collection[0] :
>>>> + collection[1];
>>>> + int vcpu = col->target_address >> 16;
>>>
>>> I'm lost with the even/odd (nr_cpus - 1)/(nr_cpus - 2) stuff, and won't
>>> it swap if nr_cpus is odd vs. even?
>>>
>>> Shouldn't we just have something like
>>>
>>> pe1 = nr_cpus - 1;
>>> pe2 = nr_cpus - 2;
>>> col1 = its_create_collection(pe1, pe1);
>>> col2 = its_create_collection(pe2, pe2);
>>>
>>> without mentioning even and odd?
>> OK
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + its_send_mapti(dev, 8192 + i, i, col);
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_set_config(8192 + i, LPI_PROP_DEFAULT);
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_set_pending_table_bit(vcpu, 8192 + i, true);
>>>> + }
>>>> + its_send_invall(collection[0]);
>>>> + its_send_invall(collection[1]);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Set the PTZ bit on each pendbaser */
>>>> +
>>>> + expected[nr_cpus - 1] = 128;
>>>> + expected[nr_cpus - 2] = 128;
>>>> +
>>>> + ptr = gicv3_data.redist_base[nr_cpus - 1] + GICR_PENDBASER;
>>>> + pendbaser = readq(ptr);
>>>> + writeq(pendbaser & ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ, ptr);
>>>> +
>>>> + ptr = gicv3_data.redist_base[nr_cpus - 2] + GICR_PENDBASER;
>>>> + pendbaser = readq(ptr);
>>>> + writeq(pendbaser & ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ, ptr);
>>>> +
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 1, true);
>>>> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 2, true);
>>>> +
>>>> + puts("Now migrate the VM, then press a key to continue...\n");
>>>> + (void)getchar();
>>>> + report(true, "Migration complete");
>>>
>>> report_info
>> OK
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + mdelay(1000);
>>>
>>> This delay needs a comment explaining why it's here.
>> OK
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + check_lpi_hits(expected);
>>>> +}
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>> @@ -847,6 +989,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>> report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>>>> test_its_migration();
>>>> report_prefix_pop();
>>>> + } else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "its-pending-migration")) {
>>>> + report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>>>> + test_its_pending_migration();
>>>> + report_prefix_pop();
>>>> + } else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "its-migrate-unmapped-collection")) {
>>>> + report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>>>> + test_migrate_unmapped_collection();
>>>> + report_prefix_pop();
>>>> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "its-introspection") == 0) {
>>>> report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>>>> test_its_introspection();
>>>> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
>>>> index 8b8ec79..d917157 100644
>>>> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
>>>> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
>>>> @@ -144,6 +144,22 @@ extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-migration'
>>>> groups = its migration
>>>> arch = arm64
>>>>
>>>> +[its-pending-migration]
>>>> +file = gic.flat
>>>> +smp = $MAX_SMP
>>>> +accel = kvm
>>>> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-pending-migration'
>>>> +groups = its migration
>>>> +arch = arm64
>>>> +
>>>> +[its-migrate-unmapped-collection]
>>>> +file = gic.flat
>>>> +smp = $MAX_SMP
>>>> +accel = kvm
>>>> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-migrate-unmapped-collection'
>>>> +groups = its migration
>>>> +arch = arm64
>>>> +
>>>> # Test PSCI emulation
>>>> [psci]
>>>> file = psci.flat
>>>> --
>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> drew
>>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
