On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:21:37PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On 2/7/20 3:06 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:34:59AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> Add two new migration tests. One testing the migration of
> >> a topology where collection were unmapped. The second test
> >> checks the migration of the pending table.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >> - tests belong to both its and migration groups
> >> ---
> >> arm/gic.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> arm/unittests.cfg | 16 +++++
> >> 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> >> index fa8626a..ec3dd3a 100644
> >> --- a/arm/gic.c
> >> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> >> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void lpi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
> >> smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in lpi_stats_expect */
> >> lpi_stats.observed.cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
> >> lpi_stats.observed.lpi_id = irqnr;
> >> + acked[lpi_stats.observed.cpu_id]++;
> >> smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_lpi_stats */
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -239,6 +240,18 @@ static void secondary_lpi_test(void)
> >> while (1)
> >> wfi();
> >> }
> >> +
> >> +static void check_lpi_hits(int *expected)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
> >> + if (acked[i] != expected[i])
> >> + report(false, "expected %d LPIs on PE #%d, %d observed",
> >> + expected[i], i, acked[i]);
> >
> > report_info
> > pass = false
> >
> >> + }
> >> + report(true, "check LPI on all vcpus");
> >
> > report(pass, ...);
> I still don't get the issue.
Your messages aren't consistent and have dynamic info. You need
report_info(...); // dynamic info
if (failure_condition) {
pass_boolean = false;
}
report(pass_boolean, single_message_for_both_pass_and_failure);
> >
> >> +}
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> static void gicv2_ipi_send_self(void)
> >> @@ -594,6 +607,8 @@ static void gic_test_mmio(void)
> >> static void test_its_introspection(void) {}
> >> static void test_its_trigger(void) {}
> >> static void test_its_migration(void) {}
> >> +static void test_migrate_unmapped_collection(void) {}
> >> +static void test_its_pending_migration(void) {}
> >
> > I'm not sure what's worse. This pile of stubs or one #ifdef in main()
> > wrapping all the calls.
> Those stubs now are in the arm header.
> >
> >>
> >> #else /* __arch64__ */
> >>
> >> @@ -666,6 +681,18 @@ static bool its_prerequisites(int nb_cpus)
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void set_lpi(struct its_device *dev, u32 eventid, u32 physid,
> >> + struct its_collection *col)
> >> +{
> >> + if (!dev || !col)
> >
> > I don't think col can be null, and this doesn't look like the right place
> > to check if dev is null. If we're bothiner to call set_lpi, then I
> > think we should already expect dev to be good to go.
> put an assert() instead
> >
> >> + report_abort("wrong device or collection");
> >> +
> >> + its_send_mapti(dev, physid, eventid, col);
> >> +
> >> + gicv3_lpi_set_config(physid, LPI_PROP_DEFAULT);
> >> + its_send_invall(col);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Setup the configuration for those mappings:
> >> * dev_id=2 event=20 -> vcpu 3, intid=8195
> >> @@ -806,6 +833,121 @@ static void test_its_migration(void)
> >> its_send_int(dev7, 255);
> >> check_lpi_stats();
> >> }
> >> +
> >> +static void test_migrate_unmapped_collection(void)
> >> +{
> >> + struct its_collection *col;
> >> + struct its_device *dev2, *dev7;
> >> + u8 config;
> >> +
> >> + if (its_setup1())
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + col = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 1, nr_cpus - 1);
> >> + dev2 = its_get_device(2);
> >> + dev7 = its_get_device(7);
> >> +
> >> + /* MAPTI with the collection unmapped */
> >> + set_lpi(dev2, 0, 8192, col);
> >> +
> >> + puts("Now migrate the VM, then press a key to continue...\n");
> >> + (void)getchar();
> >> + report(true, "Migration complete");
> >
> > report_info
> yep
> >
> >> +
> >> + /* on the destination, map the collection */
> >> + its_send_mapc(col, true);
> >> +
> >> + lpi_stats_expect(2, 8196);
> >> + its_send_int(dev7, 255);
> >> + check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> + config = gicv3_lpi_get_config(8192);
> >> + report(config == LPI_PROP_DEFAULT,
> >> + "Config of LPI 8192 was properly migrated");
> >> +
> >> + lpi_stats_expect(nr_cpus - 1, 8192);
> >> + its_send_int(dev2, 0);
> >> + check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> + /* unmap the collection */
> >> + its_send_mapc(col, false);
> >> +
> >> + lpi_stats_expect(-1, -1);
> >> + its_send_int(dev2, 0);
> >> + check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> + /* remap event 0 onto lpiid 8193 */
> >> + set_lpi(dev2, 0, 8193, col);
> >> + lpi_stats_expect(-1, -1);
> >> + its_send_int(dev2, 0);
> >> + check_lpi_stats();
> >> +
> >> + /* remap the collection */
> >> + its_send_mapc(col, true);
> >> + lpi_stats_expect(nr_cpus - 1, 8193);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void test_its_pending_migration(void)
> >> +{
> >> + struct its_device *dev;
> >> + struct its_collection *collection[2];
> >> + int expected[NR_CPUS];
> >
> > expected = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(int));
> >
> > I know there are other places using NR_CPUS right now that don't have to,
> > but we shouldn't add more. Eventually I'll change the other places too.
> OK
> >
> >> + u64 pendbaser;
> >> + void *ptr;
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + if (its_prerequisites(4))
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + dev = its_create_device(2 /* dev id */, 8 /* nb_ites */);
> >> + its_send_mapd(dev, true);
> >> +
> >> + collection[0] = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 1, nr_cpus - 1);
> >> + collection[1] = its_create_collection(nr_cpus - 2, nr_cpus - 2);
> >> + its_send_mapc(collection[0], true);
> >> + its_send_mapc(collection[1], true);
> >> +
> >> + /* disable lpi at redist level */
> >> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 1, false);
> >> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 2, false);
> >> +
> >> + /* even lpis are assigned to even cpu */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
> >> + struct its_collection *col = i % 2 ? collection[0] :
> >> + collection[1];
> >> + int vcpu = col->target_address >> 16;
> >
> > I'm lost with the even/odd (nr_cpus - 1)/(nr_cpus - 2) stuff, and won't
> > it swap if nr_cpus is odd vs. even?
> >
> > Shouldn't we just have something like
> >
> > pe1 = nr_cpus - 1;
> > pe2 = nr_cpus - 2;
> > col1 = its_create_collection(pe1, pe1);
> > col2 = its_create_collection(pe2, pe2);
> >
> > without mentioning even and odd?
> OK
> >
> >> +
> >> + its_send_mapti(dev, 8192 + i, i, col);
> >> + gicv3_lpi_set_config(8192 + i, LPI_PROP_DEFAULT);
> >> + gicv3_lpi_set_pending_table_bit(vcpu, 8192 + i, true);
> >> + }
> >> + its_send_invall(collection[0]);
> >> + its_send_invall(collection[1]);
> >> +
> >> + /* Set the PTZ bit on each pendbaser */
> >> +
> >> + expected[nr_cpus - 1] = 128;
> >> + expected[nr_cpus - 2] = 128;
> >> +
> >> + ptr = gicv3_data.redist_base[nr_cpus - 1] + GICR_PENDBASER;
> >> + pendbaser = readq(ptr);
> >> + writeq(pendbaser & ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ, ptr);
> >> +
> >> + ptr = gicv3_data.redist_base[nr_cpus - 2] + GICR_PENDBASER;
> >> + pendbaser = readq(ptr);
> >> + writeq(pendbaser & ~GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ, ptr);
> >> +
> >> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 1, true);
> >> + gicv3_lpi_rdist_ctrl(nr_cpus - 2, true);
> >> +
> >> + puts("Now migrate the VM, then press a key to continue...\n");
> >> + (void)getchar();
> >> + report(true, "Migration complete");
> >
> > report_info
> OK
> >
> >> +
> >> + mdelay(1000);
> >
> > This delay needs a comment explaining why it's here.
> OK
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >
> >> +
> >> + check_lpi_hits(expected);
> >> +}
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> @@ -847,6 +989,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >> test_its_migration();
> >> report_prefix_pop();
> >> + } else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "its-pending-migration")) {
> >> + report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >> + test_its_pending_migration();
> >> + report_prefix_pop();
> >> + } else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "its-migrate-unmapped-collection")) {
> >> + report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >> + test_migrate_unmapped_collection();
> >> + report_prefix_pop();
> >> } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "its-introspection") == 0) {
> >> report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> >> test_its_introspection();
> >> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> >> index 8b8ec79..d917157 100644
> >> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> >> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> >> @@ -144,6 +144,22 @@ extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-migration'
> >> groups = its migration
> >> arch = arm64
> >>
> >> +[its-pending-migration]
> >> +file = gic.flat
> >> +smp = $MAX_SMP
> >> +accel = kvm
> >> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-pending-migration'
> >> +groups = its migration
> >> +arch = arm64
> >> +
> >> +[its-migrate-unmapped-collection]
> >> +file = gic.flat
> >> +smp = $MAX_SMP
> >> +accel = kvm
> >> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'its-migrate-unmapped-collection'
> >> +groups = its migration
> >> +arch = arm64
> >> +
> >> # Test PSCI emulation
> >> [psci]
> >> file = psci.flat
> >> --
> >> 2.20.1
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
