On 6/25/19 2:13 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> On 6/21/19 10:37 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Now that the psci call is done by the smc instruction when nested
> This suggests that we have support for PSCI calls using SMC as the conduit, but
> that is not the case, as the handle_smc function is not changed by this commit,
> and support for PSCI via SMC is added later in patch 22/59 "KVM: arm64: nv:
> Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest". Perhaps the commit message should be
> reworded to reflect that?
>> virtualization is enabled, it is clear that all hvc instruction from the
>> VM (including from the virtual EL2) are supposed to handled in the
>> virtual EL2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> index 516aead3c2a9..6c0ac52b34cc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>> #include <asm/kvm_coproc.h>
>> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h>
>> #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>> #include <asm/traps.h>
>>
>> @@ -52,6 +53,12 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
>> vcpu->stat.hvc_exit_stat++;
>>
>> + /* Forward hvc instructions to the virtual EL2 if the guest has EL2. */
>> + if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) {
>> + kvm_inject_nested_sync(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
>> + return 1;
>> + }
According to ARM DDI 0487E.a, when HCR_EL2.HCD = 1, HVC instructions are
undefined at EL2 and EL1.
Thanks,
Alex
>> +
>> ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
