On 6/21/19 10:37 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Now that the psci call is done by the smc instruction when nested
This suggests that we have support for PSCI calls using SMC as the conduit, but
that is not the case, as the handle_smc function is not changed by this commit,
and support for PSCI via SMC is added later in patch 22/59 "KVM: arm64: nv:
Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest". Perhaps the commit message should be
reworded to reflect that?
> virtualization is enabled, it is clear that all hvc instruction from the
> VM (including from the virtual EL2) are supposed to handled in the
> virtual EL2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 516aead3c2a9..6c0ac52b34cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_coproc.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h>
> #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
> #include <asm/traps.h>
>
> @@ -52,6 +53,12 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
> vcpu->stat.hvc_exit_stat++;
>
> + /* Forward hvc instructions to the virtual EL2 if the guest has EL2. */
> + if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) {
> + kvm_inject_nested_sync(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu);
> if (ret < 0) {
> vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
