Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] arm64: KVM: encapsulate kvm_cpu_context in kvm_host_data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:40:51PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2018 12:13, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > The virt/arm core allocates a percpu structure as per the kvm_cpu_context_t
> > type, at present this is typedef'd to kvm_cpu_context and used to store
> > host cpu context. The kvm_cpu_context structure is also used elsewhere to
> > hold vcpu context. In order to use the percpu to hold additional future
> > host information we encapsulate kvm_cpu_context in a new structure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++++--
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c   | 3 ++-
> >   virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                | 4 +++-
> >   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 1550192..bcf9d60 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -205,7 +205,11 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
> >   	struct kvm_vcpu *__hyp_running_vcpu;
> >   };
> > -typedef struct kvm_cpu_context kvm_cpu_context_t;
> > +struct kvm_host_data {
> > +	struct kvm_cpu_context __kvm_cpu_state;
> > +};
> > +
> > +typedef struct kvm_host_data kvm_cpu_context_t;
> >   struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >   	struct kvm_cpu_context ctxt;
> > @@ -241,7 +245,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >   	struct kvm_guest_debug_arch external_debug_state;
> >   	/* Pointer to host CPU context */
> > -	kvm_cpu_context_t *host_cpu_context;
> > +	struct kvm_cpu_context *host_cpu_context;
> >   	struct thread_info *host_thread_info;	/* hyp VA */
> >   	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state;	/* hyp VA */
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > index 323aeb5..da34022 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> > @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ int main(void)
> >     DEFINE(CPU_FP_REGS,		offsetof(struct kvm_regs, fp_regs));
> >     DEFINE(VCPU_FPEXC32_EL2,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.ctxt.sys_regs[FPEXC32_EL2]));
> >     DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_CONTEXT,	offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.host_cpu_context));
> > -  DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU,	offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, __hyp_running_vcpu));
> > +  DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU,	offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, __hyp_running_vcpu)
> > +				+ offsetof(struct kvm_host_data, __kvm_cpu_state));
> 
> nit: You could fold the member field in the offsetof(). i.e,
>      DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU, offsetof(struct kvm_host_data,
> __kvm_cpu_state.__hyp_running_vcpu)
> 
> like the VCPU_HOST_CONTEXT above ?

Ah yes thanks for this.

Andrew Murray

> 
> Cheers
> Suzuki
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux