On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:26:59PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Christoffer,
>
> On 01/12/2018 12:07 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >Avoid saving the guest VFP registers and restoring the host VFP
> >registers on every exit from the VM. Only when we're about to run
> >userspace or other threads in the kernel do we really have to switch the
>
> s/do// ?
>
> >state back to the host state.
> >
> >We still initially configure the VFP registers to trap when entering the
> >VM, but the difference is that we now leave the guest state in the
> >hardware registers as long as we're running this VCPU, even if we
> >occasionally trap to the host, and we only restore the host state when
> >we return to user space or when scheduling another thread.
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> > arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S | 3 +++
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 48 ++++++++++++---------------------------
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++---
> > 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >index 0e9e7291a7e6..9e23bc968668 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >@@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > /* Guest debug state */
> > u64 debug_flags;
> >+ /* 1 if the guest VFP state is loaded into the hardware */
> >+ u8 guest_vfp_loaded;
> >+
> > /*
> > * We maintain more than a single set of debug registers to support
> > * debugging the guest from the host and to maintain separate host and
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> >index 612021dce84f..99467327c043 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> >@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int main(void)
> > DEFINE(CPU_GP_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, gp_regs));
> > DEFINE(CPU_USER_PT_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_regs, regs));
> > DEFINE(CPU_FP_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_regs, fp_regs));
> >+ DEFINE(VCPU_GUEST_VFP_LOADED, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.guest_vfp_loaded));
> > DEFINE(VCPU_FPEXC32_EL2, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.ctxt.sys_regs[FPEXC32_EL2]));
> > DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_CONTEXT, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.host_cpu_context));
> > DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU, offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, __hyp_running_vcpu));
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> >index a360ac6e89e9..53652287a236 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> >@@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ alternative_endif
> > add x0, x2, #CPU_GP_REG_OFFSET(CPU_FP_REGS)
> > bl __fpsimd_restore_state
> >+ mov x0, #1
> >+ strb w0, [x3, #VCPU_GUEST_VFP_LOADED]
> >+
> > // Skip restoring fpexc32 for AArch64 guests
> > mrs x1, hcr_el2
> > tbnz x1, #HCR_RW_SHIFT, 1f
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> >index 12dc647a6e5f..29e44a20f5e3 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> >@@ -24,43 +24,32 @@
> > #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
> > #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
> >-static bool __hyp_text __fpsimd_enabled_nvhe(void)
> >-{
> >- return !(read_sysreg(cptr_el2) & CPTR_EL2_TFP);
> >-}
> >-
> >-static bool __hyp_text __fpsimd_enabled_vhe(void)
> >-{
> >- return !!(read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_FPEN);
> >-}
> >-
> >-static hyp_alternate_select(__fpsimd_is_enabled,
> >- __fpsimd_enabled_nvhe, __fpsimd_enabled_vhe,
> >- ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
> >-
> >-bool __hyp_text __fpsimd_enabled(void)
>
> Now that __fpsimd_enabled is removed, I think you need to remove the
> prototype in arch/arm64/include/kvm_hyp.h too.
>
Will do.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
