Hi Christoffer,
On 02/08/2018 01:24 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:04:25PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/01/18 12:07, Christoffer Dall wrote:
+
panic(__hyp_panic_string,
spsr, elr,
read_sysreg_el2(esr), read_sysreg_el2(far),
read_sysreg(hpfar_el2), par, vcpu);
}
-static hyp_alternate_select(__hyp_call_panic,
- __hyp_call_panic_nvhe, __hyp_call_panic_vhe,
- ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
Out of interest, any specific rather to remove hyp_alternate_select and
"open-code" it?
Not sure I understand your question.
Are you asking why I replace the hyp alternatives with the has_vhe()?
If so, has_vhe() uses a static key and should therefore have the same
performance characteristics, but I find the has_vhe() version below much
more readable.
That what I was asking. Thank you for the explanation.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
