On 05/02/18 18:04, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/01/18 12:07, Christoffer Dall wrote:
@@ -436,37 +446,31 @@ static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_nvhe(u64
spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
read_sysreg(hpfar_el2), par, vcpu);
}
-static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_vhe(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void __hyp_call_panic_vhe(u64 spsr, u64 elr, u64 par,
+ struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ vcpu = host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu;
+
+ __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
+ __sysreg_restore_host_state(host_ctxt);
I was about to ask why you keep this function around as it does nothing
in VHE case. But I see that this will actually restore some values in a
later patch.
Actually, I just misread the code. Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
