On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On 06/09/16 17:41, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:32:49PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> Hi Russell, >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:49:18PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>>> Since the non-secure copies of banked registers lack architecturally >>>> defined reset values, there is no actual guarantee when entering in Hyp >>>> from secure-only firmware that the Non-Secure PL1 state will look the >>>> way that kernel entry (in particular the decompressor stub) expects. >>>> So far, we've been getting away with it thanks to implementation details >>>> of ARMv7 cores and/or bootloader behaviour, but for the sake of forwards >>>> compatibility let's try to ensure that we have a minimally sane state >>>> before dropping down into it. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> >>> >>> Can we have your acked-by on this patch to merge it via the KVM tree or >>> do you prefer merging this one directly yourself? >>> >> I have queued this via the KVM/ARM tree. If you have any objections, >> please let me know asap. > > Ah, I should have replied on this thread - I put this one into Russell's > patch system the other week, and it's in -next already. > > Sorry for the lack of communication, No worries, I removed it from the queue again. -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
