Hi Christoffer, On 06/09/16 17:41, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:32:49PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> Hi Russell, >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:49:18PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> Since the non-secure copies of banked registers lack architecturally >>> defined reset values, there is no actual guarantee when entering in Hyp >>> from secure-only firmware that the Non-Secure PL1 state will look the >>> way that kernel entry (in particular the decompressor stub) expects. >>> So far, we've been getting away with it thanks to implementation details >>> of ARMv7 cores and/or bootloader behaviour, but for the sake of forwards >>> compatibility let's try to ensure that we have a minimally sane state >>> before dropping down into it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> >> >> Can we have your acked-by on this patch to merge it via the KVM tree or >> do you prefer merging this one directly yourself? >> > I have queued this via the KVM/ARM tree. If you have any objections, > please let me know asap. Ah, I should have replied on this thread - I put this one into Russell's patch system the other week, and it's in -next already. Sorry for the lack of communication, Robin. > > Thanks, > -Christoffer > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
