On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:52:41 +0200 <ib10evp0@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Marc, > > > Everything that's needed for a typical ARMv7 is already in mainline, > > both for the kernel and qemu. And since the code is almost entirely > > shared with ARMv8, it is probably in the same state. If it not working, > > then it is a bug that should be addressed. > > > > > BTW: The Migration page [3] claims the migration feature is hardware > > > independent but it remains unclear if this expands to CPU > > > architectures and if this applies to live migration or only offline > > > migration. Some clarification in this regard would be nice to have. > > > > We do have support for live migration (migrating the VM whilst it is > > still running, tracking memory that gets dirtied). > > After reading this it's still not entirely clear to me if live migration using > your definition is also available for ARMv7 in the mainline kernel. Could you > confirm this with one sentence, please? Sorry for the inconvenience. I know it is available because I did review the code. Look for commits 7276030 KVM: arm/arm64: Enable Dirty Page logging for ARMv8 15a49a4 KVM: arm: page logging 2nd stage fault handling 53c810c KVM: arm: dirty logging write protect support c647355 KVM: arm: Add initial dirty page locking support as well as the generic infrastructure that precede them. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
