the discussion on the generic cpu seems to be stuck, is there a possibility to take this patch. so that Thunder has a chance to run some KVM. Thanks, Tirumalesh. > On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote: >> >>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote: >>>> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the >>>> minimal support required. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action. >>> >> thanks. >> >>> Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead: >>> >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html >>> >> will try with this. >> >>> Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they >>> should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit. >>> >> we are not planning(at this point) to emulate Thunder with QEMU/others. > > Fair enough. If cross-cpu VM migration is none of your concern, then > Suzuki's patch should be enough. > > Thanks, > > M. > -- > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
