On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote: > >> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote: >>> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the >>> minimal support required. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action. >> > thanks. > >> Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead: >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html >> > will try with this. > >> Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they >> should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit. >> > we are not planning(at this point) to emulate Thunder with QEMU/others. Fair enough. If cross-cpu VM migration is none of your concern, then Suzuki's patch should be enough. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
