On 07/13/2015 03:32 PM, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >> I think I prefer the flag. Offhand it sounds easier to add support for >> it to non-ARM architectures, compared to KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI. > > Actually i also voted for flag, because it is already introduced in (2), and i'm not a fan of > adding new definitions where we can reuse existing ones. IMHO using flag would make an API more > consistent. OK I will respin with user space flag. Andre, what about the kernel routing entry struct. You wanted me to get rid of KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI there too. Will you be able to manage a usespace wrong setting if the type is not set? Best Regards Eric > > Kind regards, > Pavel Fedin > Expert Engineer > Samsung Electronics Research center Russia > > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
