RE: Extensions for KVM MSI related ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Hello!

> I think I prefer the flag.  Offhand it sounds easier to add support for
> it to non-ARM architectures, compared to KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI.

 Actually i also voted for flag, because it is already introduced in (2), and i'm not a fan of
adding new definitions where we can reuse existing ones. IMHO using flag would make an API more
consistent.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux