On 07/07/2015 13:33, Wu, Feng wrote: >>> > > The need to store the consumer->producer link seems to be unique to >>> > > posted interrupts. It is difficult to say without seeing the PI code, >>> > > but I prefer to keep the bypass manager as small as possible. >> > >> > Fine. I will follow your suggestion! > If using the following changes, how can we assign 'prod', we need to use > container_of to get struct kvm_kernel_irqfd and then refer to 'prod', but > we cannot do this in irq_bypass_register_consumer(), right? It is a > common API. But we can only get the associated producer info inside > bypass manager, right? KVM's add_producer and del_producer callbacks do have a pointer to the producer. Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
