On 09/02/2015 17:21, Radim Krčmář wrote: > > So is that just legacy code still lingering around from the dawn of time > > and nobody dared to rework this or is there a particular reason for > > doing so? > > Probably laziness in 9a2bb7f486dc639a1cf2ad803bf2227f0dc0809d. Or microoptimization. Laziness is more likely though. > > I am asking because I lack the kvm_run pointer in the MMIO handler, so I > > just use vcpu->run and I wonder if there are potential issues in doing so. > > We do it at few places already, so there, hopefully, is no problem. Yup. Thanks Radim for answering! Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
