2015-02-06 17:30+0000, Andre Przywara: > As kvm_run is a member of kvm_vcpu, the vcpu alone should be sufficient, > right? Yes. > Also I see the very top of the call chain is effectively: > kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(vcpu, vcpu->run); :( > So is that just legacy code still lingering around from the dawn of time > and nobody dared to rework this or is there a particular reason for > doing so? Probably laziness in 9a2bb7f486dc639a1cf2ad803bf2227f0dc0809d. > I am asking because I lack the kvm_run pointer in the MMIO handler, so I > just use vcpu->run and I wonder if there are potential issues in doing so. We do it at few places already, so there, hopefully, is no problem. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
