On 12/03/2014 12:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:53:58AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >> On 12/03/2014 11:49 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:28:13PM +0000, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> Syncup KVM related linux headers from linux-next tree using >>>> scripts/update-linux-headers.sh. >>>> >>>> Add a new group/attribute in VGIC KVM device enabling to force >>>> vgic init: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL/KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> How can this be from linux-next? I'm pretty sure we didn't merge this >>> patch yet. >> >> Hi Christoffer, >> >> yes that's correct . I don't know how to format that kind of patch that >> refers to linux headers (I mentioned in the title tag ToBeFilled). I >> looked at other similar ones and I thought this was the wording that is >> generally used. I can move it to RFC but it will stay as is until kernel >> patches are upstreamed. In that case I should also move the QEMU VFIO >> patch back to RFC due to forwarding stuff;-) >> > This patch subject should just be something like this: > > Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Update KVM headers for KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL > > And in the commit message you point to a personal git tree that contains > the patches you're syncing against. OK thanks I will update accordingly Eric > > -Christoffer > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
