On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:53:58AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > On 12/03/2014 11:49 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:28:13PM +0000, Eric Auger wrote: > >> Syncup KVM related linux headers from linux-next tree using > >> scripts/update-linux-headers.sh. > >> > >> Add a new group/attribute in VGIC KVM device enabling to force > >> vgic init: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL/KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > How can this be from linux-next? I'm pretty sure we didn't merge this > > patch yet. > > Hi Christoffer, > > yes that's correct . I don't know how to format that kind of patch that > refers to linux headers (I mentioned in the title tag ToBeFilled). I > looked at other similar ones and I thought this was the wording that is > generally used. I can move it to RFC but it will stay as is until kernel > patches are upstreamed. In that case I should also move the QEMU VFIO > patch back to RFC due to forwarding stuff;-) > This patch subject should just be something like this: Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Update KVM headers for KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL And in the commit message you point to a personal git tree that contains the patches you're syncing against. -Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
