On 31 March 2014 15:26, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On 31 March 2014 14:36, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >> I think Marc brought up the point previously that we may get to PSCI >> spec v42.17 and the defines should perhaps encompass the version we are >> defining things for right now... >> >> That being said, assuming new spec versions don't break backwards >> compatibility in the numbering, the wording proposed by your patch does >> look simpler. >> >> I do like the hardcoded IDs because that's how it's presented in the >> spec itself. > > Cool. I'll just add the following line in kbuild to this patch and resend. by "this" patch, I meant my version. Sorry if I caused any confusion. :) > > include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + > > +header-y += psci.h > > Meanwhile, if there are any strong preferences to using the uapi > header in Anup's patch, then I can rebase later. > > Thanks, > Ashwin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
