Hi Christoffer, On 31 March 2014 14:36, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I think Marc brought up the point previously that we may get to PSCI > spec v42.17 and the defines should perhaps encompass the version we are > defining things for right now... > > That being said, assuming new spec versions don't break backwards > compatibility in the numbering, the wording proposed by your patch does > look simpler. > > I do like the hardcoded IDs because that's how it's presented in the > spec itself. Cool. I'll just add the following line in kbuild to this patch and resend. include/uapi/linux/Kbuild | 1 + +header-y += psci.h Meanwhile, if there are any strong preferences to using the uapi header in Anup's patch, then I can rebase later. Thanks, Ashwin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
