On 16 September 2013 14:42, Tom Sutcliffe <tom.sutcliffe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's good to know. In that case I'd vote for a few more slots > on vexpress too - I've eaten three of the four just with disks, then > there's framebuffers and balloon devices and such. The limited resource we're dealing with here is IRQ lines: the vexpress board uses most of them for its own purposes, and the virtio spec says we have to give each virtio-mmio transport its own dedicated IRQ line. (It's possible the actual implementation doesn't require that, in which case we could relax the spec and have QEMU wire up multiple transports to an IRQ; I haven't tested...) -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
