On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 14:45 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 October 2012 08:51, Christoffer Dall
> <c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +struct kvm_device_address {
> > + __u32 id;
> > + __u64 addr;
> > +};
>
> Ben suggested that this should either be a 64 bit id or have explicit
> padding. Other than that I think that our current proposed ABI for
> ARM irqchips is in line with the discussion we just had at KVM Forum
> for handling non-x86 in-kernel irqchips [hopefully somebody will
> write the details of that up...]
>
> Ben, do I have that right?
I believe it is :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
