On 22 October 2012 08:51, Christoffer Dall
<c.dall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +struct kvm_device_address {
> + __u32 id;
> + __u64 addr;
> +};
Ben suggested that this should either be a 64 bit id or have explicit
padding. Other than that I think that our current proposed ABI for
ARM irqchips is in line with the discussion we just had at KVM Forum
for handling non-x86 in-kernel irqchips [hopefully somebody will
write the details of that up...]
Ben, do I have that right?
thanks
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
