Re: [PATCH 0/7] Various cleanup/fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/10/12 16:50, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>>>>   ARM: KVM: move MMIO handling to its own files
>>>>
>>>> this one I'll look at later today.
>>>
>>> OK. Let me know what you think. I have a couple of other patches on the
>>> same theme.
>>>
>>
>> I will. Since the mmio handling is controversial, it's good that we
>> split that up.
>>
>> Unless the other patches are *necessary* for an upstream merge, I
>> think we should announce a code freeze and target an upstream merge
>> asap for everyone's benefit.
>
> Depending what you can necessary. A number of patches I've queued are
> related to moving accesses to HSR and friends into inline functions,
> making the code more readable - again, this could help the reviewers.
> They are mostly one-liners.
>

necessary as in bugfixes or API stabilization.

My whole point is that we can keep improving forever, but the more
cosmetics we change the more changes need to be reviewed.

>> It seems to me that we have a bug on restart to fix and
>
> Care to elaborate on this one?
>

just fire up a guest and execute "reboot" in there and see the guest
kernel crash when it comes back up. If you can't reproduce, we should
talk more :)

>> that vgic base interface to consider before more cleanup.
>
> The code looks good enough for me, and I vote for merging it right now.
> We badly need it.
>

I'm waiting for a qemu side patch from Peter (cc'ed), but I think we
were going to get this during this week, and then I'll merge.

>> The code is never going to be perfect, but we should fix
>> problems at this point, as I really think it is good enough and I hope
>> that some more people on lakml will think so too.
>
> Best way to verify this is to post it. One thing to consider is to have
> it based on 3.7-rc1. Specially as the whole uapi mess has gone in, there
> is a number of annoying conflicts to resolve (yes, I went through the
> exercise two days ago...).
>

sure, I'll base it on 3.7-rc1.

-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux