On 17/10/12 16:50, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>> ARM: KVM: move MMIO handling to its own files >>> >>> this one I'll look at later today. >> >> OK. Let me know what you think. I have a couple of other patches on the >> same theme. >> > > I will. Since the mmio handling is controversial, it's good that we > split that up. > > Unless the other patches are *necessary* for an upstream merge, I > think we should announce a code freeze and target an upstream merge > asap for everyone's benefit. Depending what you can necessary. A number of patches I've queued are related to moving accesses to HSR and friends into inline functions, making the code more readable - again, this could help the reviewers. They are mostly one-liners. > It seems to me that we have a bug on restart to fix and Care to elaborate on this one? > that vgic base interface to consider before more cleanup. The code looks good enough for me, and I vote for merging it right now. We badly need it. > The code is never going to be perfect, but we should fix > problems at this point, as I really think it is good enough and I hope > that some more people on lakml will think so too. Best way to verify this is to post it. One thing to consider is to have it based on 3.7-rc1. Specially as the whole uapi mess has gone in, there is a number of annoying conflicts to resolve (yes, I went through the exercise two days ago...). M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
