Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: KVM: add support for minimal host vs guest profiling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> In order to be able to correctly profile what is happening on the
> host, we need to be able to identify when we're running on the guest,
> and log these events differently.
>
> Perf offers a simple way to register callbacks into KVM. Mimic what
> x86 does and enjoy being able to profile your KVM host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ++
>  arch/arm/kvm/Makefile           |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c              |  5 ++-
>  arch/arm/kvm/perf.c             | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/kvm/perf.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4302007..32299c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -207,4 +207,7 @@ static inline int kvm_test_age_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
>  struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu(void);
>  struct kvm_vcpu __percpu **kvm_get_running_vcpus(void);
>
> +int kvm_perf_init(void);
> +int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
> index 4f27970..73c268a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += init.o interrupts.o exports.o
>
>  kvm-arm-y += $(addprefix ../../../virt/kvm/, kvm_main.o coalesced_mmio.o)
>
> -kvm-arm-y += arm.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o coproc.o
> +kvm-arm-y += arm.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o coproc.o perf.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += kvm-arm.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC) += vgic.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 8d8bf72..743bdc8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -995,7 +995,9 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void)
>         err = kvm_timer_hyp_init();
>         if (err)
>                 goto out_free_mappings;
> -
> +
> +       kvm_perf_init();
> +
>         return 0;
>  out_free_vfp:
>         free_percpu(kvm_host_vfp_state);
> @@ -1090,6 +1092,7 @@ void kvm_arch_exit(void)
>                 free_page(per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu));
>                 per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu) = 0;
>         }
> +       kvm_perf_teardown();
>  }
>
>  static int arm_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/perf.c b/arch/arm/kvm/perf.c

seems a bit overkill with a separate file, I would prefer if this was
just in arm.c

> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e7c42fd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/perf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +/*
> + * Based on the x86 implementation.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
> + * Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +
> +static int kvm_is_in_guest(void)
> +{
> +        return kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu() != NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_is_user_mode(void)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +       vcpu = kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu();
> +
> +       if (vcpu)
> +               return (*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & MODE_MASK) == USR_MODE;

isn't this completely racy if the vcpu is freed from under your?

> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long kvm_get_guest_ip(void)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +       vcpu = kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu();
> +
> +       if (vcpu)
> +               return *vcpu_pc(vcpu);

ditto?

> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
> +       .is_in_guest    = kvm_is_in_guest,
> +       .is_user_mode   = kvm_is_user_mode,
> +       .get_guest_ip   = kvm_get_guest_ip,
> +};
> +
> +int kvm_perf_init(void)
> +{
> +       return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_perf_teardown(void)
> +{
> +       return perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
> +}
> --
> 1.7.12
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux