On 4/24/24 07:35, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> Also, does this need to go to stable although it is kinda big for >> stable. If stable, do we need a smaller fix first which is backportable? > Correct me, if I am wrong, but I believe TDX guest is the only user of > ACPI MADT wake up method. At least it was added into kernel for TDX guest. > So it wouldn't fix anything user-visible. It might affect a future > platform that uses this wake up method, but it is a guessing game. Yeah, the MADT wakeup is pretty funky, highly TDX specific, and not in use or planned to be _put_ into use anywhere else. The X86S "fix" for running in real mode does something else entirely: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/776648 _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
