On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:50:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:38:42AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > It was wrong from beginning. If ACPI MADT wake up method is used on the > > platform, we cannot handle offline, regardless if it is TDX or not. > > Sounds to me like this fact should be a prominent part of the commit > message and these 1-4 patches should be carved out as a separate set > fixing that ACPI MADT thing and I should take them separately now...? > > Also, does this need to go to stable although it is kinda big for > stable. If stable, do we need a smaller fix first which is backportable? Correct me, if I am wrong, but I believe TDX guest is the only user of ACPI MADT wake up method. At least it was added into kernel for TDX guest. So it wouldn't fix anything user-visible. It might affect a future platform that uses this wake up method, but it is a guessing game. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
