On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:03:18 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, but still get purgatory code built in which is > > > totally useless. > > > > > > Not sure if I think too much over this. > > > > I see your point here, and I would suggest changing the > > CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY symbol to just indicate > > the availability of the purgatory code for the arch, rather > > than actually controlling the code itself. I already mentioned > > this for s390, but riscv would need the same thing on top. > > > > I think the change below should address your concern. > > Since no new comment, do you mind spinning v2 to wrap all these up? This patchset remains in mm-hotfixes-unstable from the previous -rc cycle. Eric, do you have any comments? Arnd, do you plan on a v2? If not, should I merge v1? If so, should I now add cc:stable? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
