On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:15:07PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > On 06/09/23 at 08:30pm, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2023 14:02:57 +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > > In v5 patch, Catalin helped review and acked the patch. However, an > > > uninitialized local varilable is warned out by static checker when Will > > > tried to merge the patch. And Will complained the code flow in > > > reserve_crashkernel() is hard to follow, required to refactor. While > > > when I tried to do the refactory, I feel it's not easy, the existing > > > several cases causes that. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/kdump). > > > > I reworte some of the paragraphs in the documentation patch, removed > > some sentences to make it easier to read (some details were pretty > > obvious). Please have a look, if you think I missed something important, > > just send a patch on top. Thanks. > > > > [1/2] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high > > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/6c4dcaddbd36 > > [2/2] Documentation: add kdump.rst to present crashkernel reservation on arm64 > > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/03dc0e05407f > > Could you help add below code change into the document patch commit? I > forgot adding it and got warning report from lkp test robot. > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306110549.ynH2Juok-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst > index ae21f8118830..dcfebddb6088 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture > sve > tagged-address-abi > tagged-pointers > + kdump I've seen the warning as well. Please send a patch fixing this as I try to avoid rebasing. Also we keep this part in alphabetical order. Thanks. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
