Hi Catalin, On 06/09/23 at 08:30pm, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2023 14:02:57 +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > In v5 patch, Catalin helped review and acked the patch. However, an > > uninitialized local varilable is warned out by static checker when Will > > tried to merge the patch. And Will complained the code flow in > > reserve_crashkernel() is hard to follow, required to refactor. While > > when I tried to do the refactory, I feel it's not easy, the existing > > several cases causes that. > > > > [...] > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/kdump). > > I reworte some of the paragraphs in the documentation patch, removed > some sentences to make it easier to read (some details were pretty > obvious). Please have a look, if you think I missed something important, > just send a patch on top. Thanks. > > [1/2] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/6c4dcaddbd36 > [2/2] Documentation: add kdump.rst to present crashkernel reservation on arm64 > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/03dc0e05407f Could you help add below code change into the document patch commit? I forgot adding it and got warning report from lkp test robot. https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306110549.ynH2Juok-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst index ae21f8118830..dcfebddb6088 100644 --- a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture sve tagged-address-abi tagged-pointers + kdump features _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
