On 09/05/2022 12:52, Sean Christopherson wrote: > I find the shortlog to be very confusing, the bug has nothing to do with disabling > VMX and I distinctly remember wrapping VMXOFF with exception fixup to prevent doom > if VMX is already disabled :-). The issue is really that nmi_shootdown_cpus() doesn't > play nice with being called twice. > Hey Sean, OK - I agree with you, the issue is really about the double list addition. > [...] > > Call stacks for the two callers would be very, very helpful. > [...] > This feels like were just adding more duct tape to the mess. nmi_shootdown() is > still unsafe for more than one caller, and it takes a _lot_ of staring and searching > to understand that crash_smp_send_stop() is invoked iff CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y, i.e. > that it will call smp_ops.crash_stop_other_cpus() and not just smp_send_stop(). > > Rather than shared a flag between two relatively unrelated functions, what if we > instead disabling virtualization in crash_nmi_callback() and then turn the reboot > call into a nop if an NMI shootdown has already occurred? That will also add a > bit of documentation about multiple shootdowns not working. > > And I believe there's also a lurking bug in native_machine_emergency_restart() that > can be fixed with cleanup. SVM can also block INIT and so should be disabled during > an emergency reboot. > > The attached patches are compile tested only. If they seem sane, I'll post an > official mini series. Thanks Sean, it makes sense - my patch is more a "band-aid" whereas yours fixes it in a more generic way. Confess I found the logic of your patch complex, but as you said, it requires a *lot* of code analysis to understand these multiple shutdown patches, the problem is complicated by nature heh I've tested your patch 0001 and it works well for all cases [0], so go ahead and submit the miniseries, feel free to add: Reported-and-tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> I've read patch 0002 and it makes sense to me as well, a good proactive bug fix =) With that said, I'll of course drop this one from V2 of this series. Cheers, Guilherme [0] A summary of my tests and the code paths that the panic shutdown take depending on some conditions: New function that disables VMX/SVM: cpu_crash_disable_virtualization() [should be executed in every online CPU on shutdown) The panic path triggers the following call stacks depending on kdump and post_notifiers: (1) kexec/kdump + !crash_kexec_post_notifiers ->machine_crash_shutdown() ----.crash_shutdown() <custom handler> ------native_machine_crash_shutdown() [all custom handlers except Xen PV call the native generic function] --------crash_smp_send_stop() ----------kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() ------------nmi_shootdown_cpus(kdump_nmi_callback) --------------crash_nmi_callback() ----------------kdump_nmi_callback() ------------------cpu_crash_disable_virtualization() (2) kexec/kdump + crash_kexec_post_notifiers ->crash_smp_send_stop() ----kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus() ------nmi_shootdown_cpus(kdump_nmi_callback) --------crash_nmi_callback() ----------kdump_nmi_callback() ------------cpu_crash_disable_virtualization() After this path, will execute machine_crash_shutdown() but crash_smp_send_stop() is guarded against double execution. Also, emergency restart calls emergency_vmx_disable_all() . (3) !kexec/kdump + crash_kexec_post_notifiers Same as (2) (4) !kexec/kdump + !crash_kexec_post_notifiers -> smp_send_stop() ----native_stop_other_cpus() ------apic_send_IPI_allbutself(REBOOT_VECTOR) --------sysvec_reboot ----------cpu_emergency_vmxoff() <if the IPI approach succeeded, CPU stopped here> If not: ------register_stop_handler() --------apic_send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR) ----------smp_stop_nmi_callback() ------------cpu_emergency_vmxoff() After that, emergency_vmx_disable_all() gets called in the emergency restart path as well. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
