On 2022-05-10, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> As already mentioned in the other reply, panic() sometimes stops the >> other CPUs using NMI, for example, see kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus(). >> >> Another situation is when the CPU using the lock ends in some >> infinite loop because something went wrong. The system is in >> an unpredictable state during panic(). >> >> I am not sure if this is possible with the code under gsmi_dev.lock >> but such things really happen during panic() in other subsystems. >> Using trylock in the panic() code path is a good practice. > > I believe that Peter Zijlstra had a special spin lock for NMIs or > early printk, where it would not block if the lock was held on the > same CPU. That is, if an NMI happened and paniced while this lock was > held on the same CPU, it would not deadlock. But it would block if the > lock was held on another CPU. Yes. And starting with 5.19 it will be carrying the name that _you_ came up with (cpu_sync): printk_cpu_sync_get_irqsave() printk_cpu_sync_put_irqrestore() John _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
