On 9/24/21 4:51 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 12:41:32PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:05:58AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Unless we find other way to guarantee RIP-relative access, we must use
fixup_pointer() to access any global variables.
Yah, I've asked compiler folks about any guarantees we have wrt
rip-relative addresses but it doesn't look good. Worst case, we'd have
to do the fixup_pointer() thing.
In the meantime, Tom and I did some more poking at this and here's a
diff ontop.
The direction being that we'll stick both the AMD and Intel
*cc_platform_has() call into cc_platform.c for which instrumentation
will be disabled so no issues with that.
And that will keep all that querying all together in a single file.
And still do cc_platform_has() calls in __startup_64() codepath?
It's broken.
Intel detection in cc_platform_has() relies on boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor
which is not initialized until early_cpu_init() in setup_arch(). Given
that X86_VENDOR_INTEL is 0 it leads to false-positive.
Yeah, Tom, I had the same question yesterday.
/me looks in his direction.
Yup, all the things we talked about.
But we also know that cc_platform_has() gets called a few other times
before boot_cpu_data is initialized - so more false-positives. For
cc_platform_has() to work properly, given the desire to consolidate the
calls, IMO, Intel will have to come up with some early setting that can be
enabled and checked in place of boot_cpu_data or else you live with
false-positives.
Thanks,
Tom
:-)
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
