On 7/28/21 8:22 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote: >> Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be >> used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like >> sev_active(), etc. >> >> While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will >> also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active(). >> >> The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the >> same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and > > None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into > random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through > sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can > tell. Ok, let me make sure of that and I'll change to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL if that's the case. Thanks, Tom > _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
