On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:05PM -0500, Tom Lendacky via iommu wrote: > Introduce an x86 version of the prot_guest_has() function. This will be > used in the more generic x86 code to replace vendor specific calls like > sev_active(), etc. > > While the name suggests this is intended mainly for guests, it will > also be used for host memory encryption checks in place of sme_active(). > > The amd_prot_guest_has() function does not use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the > same reasons previously stated when changing sme_active(), sev_active and None of that applies here as none of the callers get pulled into random macros. The only case of that is sme_me_mask through sme_mask, but that's not something this series replaces as far as I can tell. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
