From: Petr Mladek > Sent: 11 May 2021 15:22 > > On Tue 2021-05-11 12:58:47, David Laight wrote: > > From: Steven Rostedt > > > Sent: 11 May 2021 13:53 > > > > > > On Tue, 11 May 2021 12:36:06 +0000 > > > David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > x1 : ffffff93fef15788 x0 : ffffffe3622352e0 > > > > > Call trace: > > > > > lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e] > > > > > direct_entry+0x16c/0x1b4 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e] > > > > > full_proxy_write+0x74/0xa4 > > > > > > > > Is there any way to get it to print each module ID only once? > > > > > > If there's a trivial way to do that, then perhaps it should be done, but for > > > now, this patch series isn't as obnoxious as the previous versions. It only > > > affects stack traces, and I'm fine with that. > > > > True. Printing the id in the module list was horrid. > > > > The real downside is all the extra text that will overflow the > > in-kernel buffer. > > At least it shouldn't be extra lines causing screen wrap. > > Unless the variable names are long - hi rust :-) > > Note that the ID is printed only when CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID > is enabled. It will be used only by some distros/vendors that > use it to download the debuginfo packages. Until Ubuntu decide to turn it on :-) Actually, for the use case, the id could be trimmed significantly. It is only trying to differentiate between builds of a specific module. So even 8 digits would be plenty. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
