RE: [PATCH v6 00/13] Add build ID to stacktraces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Steven Rostedt
> Sent: 11 May 2021 13:53
> 
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 12:36:06 +0000
> David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >  x1 : ffffff93fef15788 x0 : ffffffe3622352e0
> > >  Call trace:
> > >   lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> > >   direct_entry+0x16c/0x1b4 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> > >   full_proxy_write+0x74/0xa4
> >
> > Is there any way to get it to print each module ID only once?
> 
> If there's a trivial way to do that, then perhaps it should be done, but for
> now, this patch series isn't as obnoxious as the previous versions. It only
> affects stack traces, and I'm fine with that.

True. Printing the id in the module list was horrid.

The real downside is all the extra text that will overflow the
in-kernel buffer.
At least it shouldn't be extra lines causing screen wrap.
Unless the variable names are long - hi rust :-)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux