On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:44:14AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > Because We tend to use kexec_file_load more and improve/enhance it in the > future, and gradually obsolete the old kexec_load interface which this > patchset is trying to fix on. That's not going to happen; 32-bit ARM kexec uses the kexec_load interface rather than the kexec_file_load version, and I see no one with any interest in changing that - and there's users of the former. I don't see how it's possible to convert 32-bit ARM kexec to the kexec_file_load interface - this assumes that all you have are the kernel, initrd, and commandline, but on 32-bit ARM kexec, we have kernel, initrd and the dtb blob which the user can specify. So, if we wanted to obsolete the kexec_load interface, _first_ there needs to be a way to provide users with the existing functionality they have already in place on 32-bit ARM - otherwise we're looking at a userspace regression. Especially as kexec_file_load takes precedence on some distro patched versions of the kexec tool, irrespective of which interface the user requests of the tool. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
