Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: Update boot parameters defination

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:01 AM Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Kairui
> On 05/14/19 at 01:09pm, Kairui Song wrote:
> > Since kernel commit e6e094e053af75 ("x86/acpi, x86/boot: Take RSDP address
> > from boot params if available"), kernel accept a acpi_rsdp_addr param in
> > boot_params. Sync the x86_linux_param_header to support this param.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/x86/x86-linux.h | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/x86/x86-linux.h b/include/x86/x86-linux.h
> > index 352ea02..a5d8df8 100644
> > --- a/include/x86/x86-linux.h
> > +++ b/include/x86/x86-linux.h
> > @@ -45,8 +45,7 @@ struct apm_bios_info {
> >       uint16_t cseg_len;      /* 0x4e */
> >       uint16_t cseg_16_len;   /* 0x50 */
> >       uint16_t dseg_len;      /* 0x52 */
> > -     uint8_t  reserved[44];  /* 0x54 */
> > -};
> > +} __attribute__((packed));
>
> It should be good to keep same as the kernel header without packed
> attribute.
>
> is it possible to sync the latest mainline uapi bootparam header file,
> maybe after this series get solved?
>

Hi Dave,

I can remove the packed attr then, just ensure it won't break
anything, a bit paranoid maybe...

About sync the whole structure, the problem is kexec tools' header
structure is different so that will change a lot. Maybe could be
discussed seperately.

-- 
Best Regards,
Kairui Song

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux