On 03/15/18 at 12:06pm, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:21:59 +0800
> Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 03/06/18 at 02:15pm, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > Not all architectures implement KEXEC_FILE_LOAD. However, on some
> > > archiectures KEXEC_FILE_LOAD is required when secure boot is
> > > enabled in locked-down mode. Previously users had to select the
> > > KEXEC_FILE_LOAD syscall with undocumented -s option. However, if
> > > they did pass the option kexec would fail on architectures that do
> > > not support it.
> > >
> > > So add an -a option that tries KEXEC_FILE_LOAD and when it is not
> > > supported tries KEXEC_LOAD.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v3: instead of changing the deafult add extra option
> > > v4: actually check -ENOSYS as well
> > > ---
> > > kexec/kexec.c | 52
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- kexec/kexec.h
> > > | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kexec/kexec.c b/kexec/kexec.c
> > > index a95cfb473d6b..5c5aee344b41 100644
> > > --- a/kexec/kexec.c
> > > +++ b/kexec/kexec.c
> > > @@ -1243,6 +1243,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > int do_unload = 0;
> > > int do_reuse_initrd = 0;
> > > int do_kexec_file_syscall = 0;
> > > + int do_kexec_fallback = 0;
> > > int do_status = 0;
> > > void *entry = 0;
> > > char *type = 0;
> > > @@ -1367,10 +1368,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > break;
> > > case OPT_KEXEC_FILE_SYSCALL:
> > > do_kexec_file_syscall = 1;
> > > + do_kexec_fallback = 0;
> > > break;
> > > case OPT_KEXEC_SYSCALL:
> > > do_kexec_file_syscall = 0;
> > > + do_kexec_fallback = 0;
> > > break;
> > > + case OPT_KEXEC_SYSCALL_AUTO:
> > > + do_kexec_file_syscall = 1;
> > > + do_kexec_fallback = 1;
> >
> > need a break here
>
> Indeed
>
> >
> > > case OPT_STATUS:
> > > do_status = 1;
> > > break;
> > > @@ -1442,16 +1448,54 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > result = k_status(kexec_flags);
> > > }
> > > if (do_unload) {
> > > - if (do_kexec_file_syscall)
> > > + if (do_kexec_file_syscall) {
> > > result =
> > > kexec_file_unload(kexec_file_flags);
> > > - else
> > > + if ((result == -ENOSYS) &&
> > > do_kexec_fallback)
> > > + do_kexec_file_syscall = 0;
> > > + }
> > > + if (!do_kexec_file_syscall)
> > > result = k_unload(kexec_flags);
> > > }
> > > if (do_load && (result == 0)) {
> > > - if (do_kexec_file_syscall)
> > > + if (do_kexec_file_syscall) {
> > > result = do_kexec_file_load(fileind, argc,
> > > argv, kexec_file_flags);
> > > - else
> > > + if (do_kexec_fallback) switch (result) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Something failed with signature
> > > verification.
> > > + * Reject the image.
> > > + */
> > > + case -ELIBBAD:
> > > + case -EKEYREJECTED:
> > > + case -ENOPKG:
> > > + case -ENOKEY:
> > > + case -EBADMSG:
> > > + case -EMSGSIZE:
> > > + /*
> > > + * By default reject or do
> > > nothing if
> > > + * succeded
> > > + */
> > > + default: break;
> > > + case -ENOSYS: /* not implemented */
> > > + /*
> > > + * Parsing image or other
> > > options failed
> > > + * The image may be
> > > invalid or image
> > > + * type may not supported
> > > by kernel so
> > > + * retry parsing in
> > > kexec-tools.
> > > + */
> > > + case -EINVAL:
> > > + case -ENOEXEC:
> > > + /*
> > > + * ENOTSUPP can be
> > > unsupported image
> > > + * type or unsupported PE
> > > signature
> > > + * wrapper type, duh
> > > + */
> > > + case -ENOTSUP:
> > > + do_kexec_file_syscall = 0;
> > > + break;
> >
> > It looks to me it is enough only checking -ENOSYS maybe also
> > -ENOTSUPP and then set do_kexec_file_syscall = 0;
> >
> > EINVAL and ENOEXEC are real errors, I do not understand why still
> > fallback.
>
> If you pass an image type that the kernel does not understand (eg.
> multiboot or uImage) then the kernel will return a real error because
> it does not understand the image. However, kexec-tools should still be
> able to load it, automatically. That's what the -auto stands for.
This semes over engineering, the initial purpose is to fallback when
kexec_file_load is not supported, so I would suggest not to do more
than that.
>
> > Also thos signature verification errors are not needed
> > in this code as well.
>
> Yes, they are not needed. They are here so it's obvious which errors
> are signature verification errors.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
Thanks
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
